Acta Biologica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Biologica


ISSN: 2450-8330     eISSN: 2353-3013    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ab.2021.28-05
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ

Issue archive / No. 28
Selection of calling sites by Pelophylax porosus porosus (Anura: Ranidae)

Authors: Keigo Takahashi ORCID
Biological Laboratory, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University

Hirohiko Takeuchi ORCID
Biological Laboratory, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University
Keywords: frog amphibia breeding behavior predation risk
Data publikacji całości:2021
Page range:11 (41-51)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

In frogs, males generally use calls to attract conspecific females for breeding. Previous studies suggest that male frogs can effectively attract females by calling from an open environment, which has the advantages of avoiding the diminishing of their calls and increasing attractiveness to females by bimodal (acoustic + visual) signal. However, males calling from open sites, would be more easily detected by predators due to their exposed bodies. Male frogs may need to select a calling site that is suitable for environmental conditions to enhance their survival rate and mating success. In the present study, we examined the selection of calling sites by Pelophylax porosus porosus male, whose predators are mostly diurnal. As a results, P. p. porosus males tended to select vegetation-shaded water surfaces as daytime calling sites and select open water surfaces as night calling sites. Our results suggest that choice of calling sites by P. p. porosus males depends on whether it is daytime or night, because of differences in predation risk between daytime and night. The selection of a calling site suitable for each situation is expected to increase the fitness of the male frogs.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Arak, A. (1983). Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: P.P.G. Bateson (ed.), Mate Choice (pp. 181–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.Edirisinghe, J.P., Bambaradeniya, C.N.B. (2006). Rice fields: an ecosystem rich in biodiversity. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 34 (2), 57–59.
3.Fellers, G.M. (1979). Mate selection in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Copeia, 2, 286–290.
4.Fukada, H. (1964). On the life history of a snake, Rhabdophis t. tigrinus (Boie). Acta Herpetologica Japonica, 2, 1–4.
5.Gomez, D., Richardson, C., Lengagne, T., Plenet, S., Joly, P., Léna, J.P., Théry, M. (2009). The role of nocturnal vision in mate choice: females prefer conspicuous males in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). In: S.C.H. Barrett (ed.), Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 276 (1666) (pp. 2351–2358). London: The Royal Society Press.
6.Grafe, T.U. (1997). Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog. Hyperolius marmoratus. Animal Behaviour, 53 (5), 1103–1117.
7.Inoue, T. (1979). On the territorial behaviors of a Japanese pond frog, Rana brevipoda. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 29 (2), 149–161 (in Japanese with English abstract).
8.Kadowaki, S. (1992). Food resource overlap between the two sympatric Japanese snakes (Elaphe quadrivirgata and Rhabdophis tigrinus) in the paddy fields. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 42 (1), 1–7 (in Japanese with English abstract).
9.Kadowaki, S. (1996). Ecology of a Japanese snake community: Resource use patterns of the three sympatric snakes. Bulletin of Tsukuba University Forests, 12, 77–148 (in Japanese).
10.Kosugi, A. (1960). On the food habits of some herons. Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, 2 (15), 89–98 (in Japanese with English abstract).
11.Magnhagen, C. (1991). Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 6 (6), 183–186.
12.Matsui, M., Maeda, N. (2018). Tokyo Daruma Pond Frog Pelophylax porosus porosus (Cope, 1868). In: M. Matsui (ed.), Encyclopedia of Japanese Frogs (pp. 124–127). Tokyo: Bun-ichi Sogo Shuppan (in Japanese with English summary).
13.Momose, H., Ueta, M., Fujiwara, N., Uchiyama, T., Ishizuka, T., Morisaki, K., Matsue, M. (2005). Factors affecting the number of breeding Grey-faced Buzzard-eagles Butastur indicus. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 68 (5), 555–558 (in Japanese with English abstract).
14.Parris, K.M., McCarthy, M.A. (1999). What influences the structure of frog assemblages at forest streams? Australian Journal of Ecology, 24 (5), 495–502.
15.Rosenthal, G.G., Rand, A.S., Ryan, M.J. (2004). The vocal sac as a visual cue in anuran communication: an experimental analysis using video playback. Animal Behaviour, 68 (1), 55–58.
16.Ryan, M.J., Keddy-Hector, A. (1992). Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. The American Naturalist, 139, S4–S35.
17.Sakai, S., Yamaguchi, N., Momose, H., Higuchi, H. (2011). Seasonal shifts in foraging site and prey of Greyfaced Buzzards (Butastur indicus), breeding in Satoyama habitat of central Japan. Ornithological Science, 10 (1), 51–60.
18.Sato, T., Azuma, A. (2004). Frogs abundance and environments of levees relationships around paddy fields in alluvial fan. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 67 (5), 519–522 (in Japanese with English abstract).
19.Shimoyama, R. (1989). Breeding ecology of a Japanese pond frog, Rana porosa. In: M. Matsui, T. Hikada, R.C. Goris (eds.), Current Herpetology in East Asia (pp. 323–331). Kyoto: Herpetological Society of Japan Press.
20.Shimoyama, R. (1996). Sympatric and synchronous breeding by two pond frogs, Rana porosa brevipoda and Rana nigromaculata. Japanese Journal of Herpetology, 16, 87–93.
21.Takumi, Y., Ezaki, Y. (1998). Habitat segregation among herons and egrets in a pond-paddy complex area in Harima, Hyogo Prefecture. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 48 (1), 17–26 (in Japanese with English abstract).
22.Taylor, R.C., Buchanan, B.W., Doherty, J.L. (2007). Sexual selection in the squirrel treefrog Hyla squirella: the role of multimodal cue assessment in female choice. Animal Behaviour, 74 (6), 1753–1763.
23.Taylor, R.C., Klein, B.A., Stein, J., Ryan, M.J. (2008). Faux frogs: multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in animal behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 76 (3), 1089–1097.
24.Wells, K.D. (1977). The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour, 25, 666–693.
25.Yamada, K. (1994). Feeding behaviour and territoriality according to the prey types and habitats in the little egret Egretta garzetta. Japanese Journal of Ornithology, 42 (2), 61–75 (in Japanese with English abstract).